Hmong vs Palestinian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Palestinian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Palestinians

Average
Exceptional
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,319
SOCIAL INDEX
90.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
20th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Palestinian Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,051,018 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.191% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 191.0 Palestinians.
Hmong Integration in Palestinian Communities

Hmong vs Palestinian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $107,721, a difference of 22.3%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,790, a difference of 20.1%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $109,413, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,515, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $63,800, a difference of 13.2%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Income
Income MetricHmongPalestinian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$45,790
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$109,413
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$90,574
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$49,209
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$57,778
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$41,484
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Poor
$51,515
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$98,777
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$107,721
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$63,800
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Fair
26.1%

Hmong vs Palestinian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongPalestinian
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.3%

Hmong vs Palestinian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongPalestinian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Hmong vs Palestinian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongPalestinian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.3%

Hmong vs Palestinian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.55%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongPalestinian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Hmong vs Palestinian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongPalestinian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.4%

Hmong vs Palestinian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongPalestinian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.0%

Hmong vs Palestinian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Hmong vs Palestinian Disability
Disability MetricHmongPalestinian
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%