Hmong vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,592,499 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.987. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.471% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 471.5 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $45,673, a difference of 8.1%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $40,266, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,839 compared to $75,856, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $85,220, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $89,398, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 19.3%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.8%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.0%).