Hmong vs Sudanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Sudanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Sudanese
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sudanese Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,713,006 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.481% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 480.9 Sudanese.
Hmong vs Sudanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,695, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,215, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $84,401, a difference of 0.17%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $58,281, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $78,529, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $41,695 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $96,783 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $78,529 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $44,419 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $51,216 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $38,215 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $46,982 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $84,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $93,718 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $58,281 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Fair 12.0% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 68.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 42.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Excellent 83.0% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 16.8%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.25%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 60.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 32.4% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.75%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 53.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hmong vs Sudanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Sudanese |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Good 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |