Hmong vs Sudanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sudanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Sudanese

Average
Average
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sudanese Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,713,006 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.481% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 480.9 Sudanese.
Hmong Integration in Sudanese Communities

Hmong vs Sudanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,695, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,215, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $84,401, a difference of 0.17%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $58,281, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $78,529, a difference of 3.5%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Income
Income MetricHmongSudanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$41,695
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$96,783
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$78,529
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Tragic
$44,419
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$51,216
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Tragic
$46,982
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$84,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$93,718
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$58,281
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
24.0%

Hmong vs Sudanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongSudanese
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
23.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Fair
12.0%

Hmong vs Sudanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongSudanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Hmong vs Sudanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongSudanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
42.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
83.0%

Hmong vs Sudanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 16.8%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.25%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongSudanese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
60.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Fair
32.4%

Hmong vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.75%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.8%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongSudanese
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
53.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.6%

Hmong vs Sudanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongSudanese
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Good
66.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Hmong vs Sudanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Sudanese Disability
Disability MetricHmongSudanese
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%