Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Cuba

Average
Fair
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,721,332 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 90.8 Immigrants from Cuba.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $44,735, a difference of 25.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $78,249, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,291, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $34,910, a difference of 9.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$34,910
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$78,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$68,461
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Tragic
$38,426
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$43,461
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$33,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Tragic
$50,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$76,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$80,662
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$44,735
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.4%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 72.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
20.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 84.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
30.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 49.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
41.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
93.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
83.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
80.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
55.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
39.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Cuba
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%