Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from Cuba
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from Cuba
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,721,332 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 90.8 Immigrants from Cuba.
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $44,735, a difference of 25.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $78,249, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $50,374, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,291, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $34,910, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $34,910 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $78,249 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $68,461 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $38,426 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $43,461 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $33,291 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $50,374 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $76,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $80,662 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $44,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 72.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 84.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 72.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 49.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.2% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 41.5% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.8% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 80.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 55.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 39.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.2% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.8%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Cuba |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |