Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Puget Sound Salish

Average
Average
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Puget Sound Salish Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,396,542 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.536% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 536.5 Puget Sound Salish.
Hmong Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $55,543, a difference of 12.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $98,340, a difference of 11.6%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $53,704, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $59,934, a difference of 6.4%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $97,958, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,495, a difference of 8.8%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Income
Income MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$41,495
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$97,958
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Fair
$84,011
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Average
$46,333
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Fair
$53,704
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Fair
$39,376
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$55,543
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Fair
$93,661
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Fair
$98,340
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Fair
$59,934
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Good
25.3%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Average
9.1%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
63.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
81.7%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
30.4%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.8%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
9.4%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.19%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Excellent
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
55.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.2%

Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 16.3%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Disability
Disability MetricHmongPuget Sound Salish
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
27.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%