Hmong vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,260,275 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.225% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 224.6 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,220, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $103,705, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $89,100, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,680, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($42,111 compared to $47,617, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.4%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.3%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%).