Ecuadorian vs German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,479,848 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Germans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 53.6 Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 27.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,730, a difference of 8.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $102,254, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,070 compared to $83,358, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,935, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $93,531, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 61.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 40.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (43.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 240.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 66.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 118.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%).