Ecuadorian vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,757,042 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $121,202, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $117,814, a difference of 25.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $52,391, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,266, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $44,695, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $53,919, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 94.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 82.8%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%).