Ecuadorian vs Colville Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Colville
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Colville
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Colville Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,028,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 22.5 Colville.
Ecuadorian vs Colville Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,070 compared to $70,094, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $82,474, a difference of 13.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $85,792, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $37,514, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $51,739, a difference of 6.2%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $48,516, a difference of 6.4%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $38,047 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Tragic $85,792 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Tragic $70,094 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Tragic $42,151 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Tragic $48,516 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $37,514 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Tragic $49,774 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Tragic $82,604 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Tragic $82,474 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Tragic $51,739 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 51.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 29.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 24.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 29.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 39.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 29.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 59.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.14, a difference of 5.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 41.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 43.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 45.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 149.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 83.3%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 86.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 25.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.8%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2nd grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 83.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 29.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Colville Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 200.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 113.1%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Colville |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 30.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 55.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |