Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,667,397 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $110,614, a difference of 16.3%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $107,775, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,484, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,275, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,280, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.1%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.7%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.79%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.88%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 74.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.4%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.99%).