Ecuadorian vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,301,984 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 19.1 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,764, a difference of 17.8%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $75,240, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $55,677, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $50,292, a difference of 2.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $91,926, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.53%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 161.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 40.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 63.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.1%).