Ecuadorian vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Samoans

Poor
Fair
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,507,463 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Samoans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Samoan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $65,427, a difference of 19.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $101,580, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $51,389, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $92,385, a difference of 0.89%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,610, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianSamoan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Fair
26.0%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianSamoan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.6%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.1%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianSamoan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.4%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.42, a difference of 3.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianSamoan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Fair
32.6%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 198.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 106.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 77.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.7%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Ecuadorian vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianSamoan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%