Ecuadorian vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,805,971 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $57,919, a difference of 5.4%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $39,870, a difference of 5.2%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $91,624, a difference of 0.050%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $51,473, a difference of 0.24%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $44,825, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.96%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 141.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 72.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.3%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.0%).