Ecuadorian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,944,495 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $114,553, a difference of 20.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $111,602, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $65,326, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,540, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,542, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $51,038, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.3%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 73.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.5%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.0%).