Ecuadorian vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,423,522 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Ukrainians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $111,368, a difference of 17.1%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $59,728, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,843, a difference of 0.13%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,015, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,320, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.3%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.32%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.47%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 111.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 14.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 39.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.0%).