Ecuadorian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,364,216 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $32,345, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $71,697, a difference of 27.7%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $31,489, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $82,064, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 75.6%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.89%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 140.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 108.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 41.6%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 209.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 109.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 43.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 88.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.4%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.34%), ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 41.0%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.2%).