Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Soviet Union
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Soviet Union
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Soviet Union Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,608,125 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Soviet Union.
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $54,202, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $119,262, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $63,382, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,340, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,848, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $54,202 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Exceptional $119,262 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $95,098 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $54,290 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $63,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Exceptional $46,556 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $55,340 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Exceptional $108,457 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $112,008 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Excellent $62,848 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 24.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Excellent 11.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Good 83.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 60.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 24.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Fair 46.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 26.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 45.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 67.5%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 71.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 55.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 20.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Soviet Union Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Soviet Union |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.95% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |