Ecuadorian vs Finnish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Finnish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Finns
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Finnish Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,652,777 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Finns.
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 24.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $59,535, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $102,676, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,940, a difference of 1.6%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $83,607, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,173, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Average $43,461 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Average $102,676 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Fair $83,607 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Fair $45,940 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Average $54,721 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $38,173 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Fair $51,827 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Average $94,610 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Average $99,904 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Poor $59,535 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 28.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.48%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Poor 21.5% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 39.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 43.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 83.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.8%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.09 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Average 31.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 196.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 58.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 60.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 102.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 93.4% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Excellent 66.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Average 46.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Poor 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Finnish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Finnish |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |