Ecuadorian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,728,969 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $79,956, a difference of 14.5%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $36,690, a difference of 14.4%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $45,607, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $56,768, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $50,132, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.75%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (14.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 28.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 139.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 58.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 40.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.5%).