Ecuadorian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,367,216 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 28.4 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $29,031, a difference of 44.5%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $59,159, a difference of 38.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $66,529, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $47,722, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $33,046, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 102.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 82.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 73.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 141.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 16.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 58.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 49.8%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.4%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.11%), ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 84.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.1%).