Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Scotland

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,560,485 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Scotland.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 25.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $66,620, a difference of 21.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $114,392, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,638, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,771, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,741, a difference of 12.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$114,392
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$94,091
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$50,741
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$61,220
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$41,771
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Good
$52,638
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$105,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$112,175
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$66,620
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 65.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 56.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
83.0%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.40%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 173.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 48.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
6.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
69.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
42.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.54%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Scotland Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Scotland
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Good
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%