Ecuadorian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,465,919 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.082% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 81.7 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $118,426, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $119,955, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $68,822, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $57,003, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $44,586, a difference of 14.0%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 153.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.6%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.92%).