Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,584,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 28.0 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,522, a difference of 13.8%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,161, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $105,430, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,084, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $99,232, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 80.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.2%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.27%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.4%).