Ecuadorian vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,056,788 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 21.7 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $82,629, a difference of 13.5%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,066, a difference of 13.2%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $72,959, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $53,762, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,743, a difference of 4.2%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $47,991, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.7%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 27.6%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.94%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 101.8%), no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 92.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 13.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 69.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.4%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.39%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 257.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.8%).