Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Sri Lankans

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sri Lankan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,977,313 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Sri Lankans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,201, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $108,270, a difference of 15.5%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,234, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,470, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,496, a difference of 3.5%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $44,014, a difference of 4.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Income
Income MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Average
$44,014
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$108,234
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$93,093
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$48,040
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Excellent
$56,136
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Excellent
$40,496
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$55,470
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$101,960
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$108,270
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$64,201
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Average
25.8%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
12.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.6%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.9%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 199.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 88.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 18.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 67.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
8.4%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.0%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
94.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Average
38.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.67%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Sri Lankan Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianSri Lankan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%