Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Macedonians

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,718,978 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Macedonians.
Ecuadorian Integration in Macedonian Communities

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $59,522, a difference of 15.4%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $109,668, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,563, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,286, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $49,893, a difference of 10.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.6%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.9%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.5%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
27.9%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 87.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 12.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 69.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.39%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianMacedonian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%