Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Oceania

Poor
Average
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,894,437 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Immigrants from Oceania.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,416, a difference of 17.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,453, a difference of 11.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.43%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,297, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,617, a difference of 5.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Average
25.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.72%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Good
11.4%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
82.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.77%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 133.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%