Ecuadorian vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Swedes

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,646,948 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Swedes.
Ecuadorian Integration in Swedish Communities

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,736, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,499, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,421, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,986, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,851, a difference of 5.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Income
Income MetricEcuadorianSwedish
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
29.4%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 68.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianSwedish
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.8%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianSwedish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 40.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.7%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), currently married (43.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianSwedish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.6%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 234.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Ecuadorian vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianSwedish
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%