Ecuadorian vs Northern European Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Northern European
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Northern Europeans

Poor
Excellent
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Northern European Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,518,255 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Northern Europeans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Northern European Communities

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,658, a difference of 17.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $110,635, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,491, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,678, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,887, a difference of 8.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Income
Income MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$47,698
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Exceptional
$110,635
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$90,446
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$48,887
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Exceptional
$58,588
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Excellent
$40,491
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Fair
$51,678
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$100,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$107,870
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Exceptional
$64,658
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
28.3%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.8%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
76.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Average
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Average
82.7%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 186.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
92.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.3%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 87.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
69.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
41.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ecuadorian vs Northern European Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Northern European Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianNorthern European
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%