Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Alsatian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Alsatians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alsatian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,739,764 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 23.9 Alsatians.
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $47,284, a difference of 12.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,797, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $49,267, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,060, a difference of 2.4%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $85,053, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $95,059, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $47,284 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Average $103,010 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Average $85,053 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Good $47,023 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Good $55,380 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Good $40,060 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Tragic $49,267 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Average $95,059 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Average $100,435 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Good $61,797 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 24.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 34.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Good 11.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 25.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 44.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Poor 45.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 72.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 11.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 25.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 87.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Average 93.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 41.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Alsatian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Alsatian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |