Ecuadorian vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,691,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 11.1 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,673, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $57,309, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,510, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,795, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $86,920, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 44.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.9%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 129.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 41.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 85.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%).