Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,973,743 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 24.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,856, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $112,151, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,307, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,319, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,108, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.66%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.4%), currently married (43.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 160.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 80.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%).