Ecuadorian vs Swiss Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Swiss
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Swiss
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swiss Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,793,037 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Swiss.
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,621, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $103,071, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,315, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $37,904, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $95,511, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Good $44,076 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Good $104,396 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Average $85,681 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Average $46,315 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Good $55,731 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $37,904 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Poor $51,493 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Good $95,511 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Good $103,071 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Good $61,621 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 30.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 53.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 37.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 43.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Average 82.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.9%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Excellent 30.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 189.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 61.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Swiss Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Swiss |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |