Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Brazilian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Brazilians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Brazilian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,763,443 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 42.4 Brazilians.
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,942, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,465, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,335, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,483, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,356, a difference of 7.0%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $46,700 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Excellent $106,942 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $88,934 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $48,356 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $56,837 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Excellent $40,483 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $54,335 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Excellent $98,267 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Excellent $104,408 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Good $61,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 34.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Excellent 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Excellent 11.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.4%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Fair 46.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Average 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Excellent 30.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 119.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 53.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Fair 96.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Good 93.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Good 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Brazilian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Brazilian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |