Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,330,246 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $57,941, a difference of 12.3%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $46,929, a difference of 11.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,151, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.72%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,846, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $56,331, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.1%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%).