Ecuadorian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,716,094 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 21.2%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $36,651, a difference of 14.5%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $72,402, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $52,949, a difference of 3.8%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $48,899, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $49,997, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 32.8%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.1%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.49, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.66%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 96.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 96.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.1%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.14%), college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%).