Ecuadorian vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,827,087 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $36,999, a difference of 13.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,061, a difference of 11.1%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,080, a difference of 2.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $91,355, a difference of 2.6%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $91,730, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 60.0%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 123.9%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 95.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 103.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.2%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 239.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 87.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.2%).