Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

South American Indians

Poor
Average
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Indian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,413,924 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 3.6 South American Indians.
Ecuadorian Integration in South American Indian Communities

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,215, a difference of 13.2%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $103,624, a difference of 8.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,979, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,019, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,952, a difference of 3.8%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Income
Income MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Good
$44,206
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Good
$103,624
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Excellent
$87,446
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Good
$46,952
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Average
$54,508
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Good
$40,019
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Excellent
$52,979
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Good
$96,497
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Good
$101,171
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Good
$62,215
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
24.7%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Average
11.9%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.5%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Good
82.9%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Average
31.7%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 88.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.9%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Average
6.3%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Excellent
39.3%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Excellent
15.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Ecuadorian vs South American Indian Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianSouth American Indian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%