Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tlingit-Haida
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Tlingit-Haida

Poor
Average
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tlingit-Haida Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,724,546 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Tlingit-Haida.
Ecuadorian Integration in Tlingit-Haida Communities

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,922, a difference of 14.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $101,092, a difference of 6.3%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $45,468, a difference of 0.56%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,513, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $92,987, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Income
Income MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Average
$43,516
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Fair
$101,092
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Fair
$83,968
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Fair
$45,468
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Poor
$52,409
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Average
$39,513
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$55,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Fair
$92,987
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Poor
$97,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Excellent
$62,922
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
24.0%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 67.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.42%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Average
11.6%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 141.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.48%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
23.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.4%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
82.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.9%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.3%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Fair
32.2%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 126.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 41.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 103.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 93.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianTlingit-Haida
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
27.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%