Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,782,248 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $48,749, a difference of 10.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $86,736, a difference of 5.6%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $39,827, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.30%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $94,472, a difference of 0.68%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $50,298, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 118.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.4%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%).