Ecuadorian vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,624,214 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 14.2 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $65,874, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $83,575, a difference of 9.6%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $41,969, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($95,114 compared to $95,293, a difference of 0.19%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $90,455, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.90%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.38, a difference of 1.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 131.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 82.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 16.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 51.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 51.7%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.8%).