Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Sub-Saharan Africans

Poor
Tragic
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,058,889 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 35.8 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Ecuadorian Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $48,691, a difference of 10.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $84,235, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $77,631, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.41%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $93,748, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,391, a difference of 1.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Exceptional
22.8%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.71%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
82.0%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.86%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
36.7%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 86.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 12.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.1%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Ecuadorian vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianSubsaharan African
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%