Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Malaysians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,066,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Malaysians.
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.3%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $39,194, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $58,244, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($95,114 compared to $95,230, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $94,517, a difference of 0.83%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $81,064, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Excellent 25.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 33.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 29.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.97%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Fair 5.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 82.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.26%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 33.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 195.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 71.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 61.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.3%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.62%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Malaysian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |