Ecuadorian vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,619,576 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $68,910, a difference of 32.9%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $32,012, a difference of 31.1%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $64,692, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $52,930, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,018, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 73.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 70.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.3%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 61.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.79, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 111.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 92.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 14.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 36.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.8%), bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.17%), ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 84.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 17.9%).