Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Immigrants from Chile

Poor
Good
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,603,139 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from Chile.
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,354, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $105,655, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,440, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,353, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,697, a difference of 5.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Average
25.7%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Good
11.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.4%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Fair
5.5%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Good
31.2%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 107.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 33.9%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
6.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.3%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%