Ecuadorian vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,239,129 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,287, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $107,086, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,006, a difference of 2.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $97,339, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $48,226, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 162.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 42.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.1%).