Ecuadorian vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Crow
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,055,653 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.226% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 225.9 Crow.
Ecuadorian vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $31,729, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $63,681, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $71,337, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $35,266, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $49,234, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,012, a difference of 14.7%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 86.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 83.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 200.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 199.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 191.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 78.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 40.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 106.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 59.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 80.2%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.30%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 66.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.60%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Crow |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |