Ecuadorian vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,706,768 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 0.9 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $85,571, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $75,647, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,214 compared to $44,552, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,299, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $49,636, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.2%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 2.3%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 30.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 10.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.4%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%).