Ecuadorian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,695,512 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.2%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,735, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $104,288, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,397, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,463, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $94,622, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.88%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (43.6% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 236.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 66.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 60.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 109.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.6%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).