Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ecuadorians

Portuguese

Poor
Average
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Portuguese Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,879,027 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 31.1 Portuguese.
Ecuadorian Integration in Portuguese Communities

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $105,309, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,440, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,436, a difference of 0.97%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,177, a difference of 2.7%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $44,362, a difference of 5.7%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Income
Income MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,958
Good
$44,362
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,114
Excellent
$106,286
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,070
Exceptional
$88,976
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,214
Exceptional
$48,032
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,596
Excellent
$56,663
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,117
Good
$40,177
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,911
Exceptional
$54,436
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,574
Exceptional
$99,429
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,739
Exceptional
$105,309
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,958
Good
$61,440
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 41.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Poverty
Poverty MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.2%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.6%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 27.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.4%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Fair
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
82.2%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
33.8%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 165.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 39.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 55.3%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
91.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.26%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.91%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Education Level
Education Level MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.6%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.7%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
44.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.4%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Poor
13.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
Ecuadorian vs Portuguese Disability
Disability MetricEcuadorianPortuguese
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Fair
23.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%